It’s pretty obvious we live in a corporatocracy. Am I right?
The only thing standing in the way of this behemoth completely mowing us all over is in fact our connection with each other. That connection happens, love it or hate it, in a large part, due to Facebook. Facebook still profits off people who may not say things in line with the corporatocracy. JP Sears, Russell Brand, An0maly, ReallyGraceful, Zuby and even Ben Shapiro seem to boost their posts with Facebook ads. It can be said, in light or in lieu of this profit made by Facebook off these voices of “division” or “misinformation,” that Facebook has “sewn this division for a profit.”
The fact is: we ARE divided. That’s a fact. However, suggesting “Facebook is responsible for division” because of its profit from dissenting voices to the corporatocracy is just a sad misunderstanding of the free market and all the actual GOOD POWER the free market has in the world.
Enough of us are happy to be enlightened or informed by those going against this corporatocracy which has been referred to as “the Cathedral,” that it allows companies to profit off our dissent. Our value in the marketplace for free speech and dissenting ideas is powerful enough to create a personal conflict of financial interest for Facebook to censor us. That’s how the free market of ideas is SUPPOSED to work!
Luckily for the Cathedral, a “whistleblower,” Frances Haugen, has shown up as an answer to everyone’s prayers, leaking documents and testifying that Facebook put its profits ahead of the safety of Americans. But did it?
Haugen uses the so-called “insurrection” as just one reason Facebook has shown its conflict of interest to be “dangerous” to Americans. She said “dangerous” literally after speaking of the “insurrection.” You remember, that protest rally that got hijacked by a left-wing media employee, a radical left-wing agent provocateur and police who ended up killing people before suiciding themselves shortly thereafter? Is Haugen really whistleblowing or is this just a way to regulate (remove by making illegal) any competition in the free market of ideas to the Cathedral and its wishes for cultural and social engineering? I think you know the answer.
However, if you still cling to any notion that Facebook was a “private company” and that it operated under free market principles, here’s a lovely little tweet from Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat who chairs the Senate subcommittee hosting the hearing to put an end to the illusion. "Facebook's actions make clear that we cannot trust it to police itself. We must consider stronger oversight, effective protections for children, & tools for parents, among the needed reforms.”
You see, it’s for the children. We need them all educated on our side and injected (and possibly sterilized) to meet our quotas for the Cathedral. Won’t that make everyone feel safer?
Meanwhile on TikTok, young people (those of whom I am certain he speaks) are trending and getting massive “likes” from all kinds of ClotShot videos discussing their friends’ and personal vaccine injuries.
And the Cathedral has to be thinking: SOMEBODY MUST STOP THIS! I can only imagine what happens when stories of vaccine injuries from 5-12 year old children shared by them and their older siblings start spreading around Facebook. How could we possibly prevent or inhibit this from trending on Facebook and the trend impacting the young people who might get attention for sharing the truth? Oh, I know!
“Last week, Blumenthal, along with Democrats Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida, reintroduced the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act. The bill would ban features such as ‘likes’ and follower counts for users under the age of 16 years old. The legislation also addresses other issues such as manipulative marketing and the amplification of harmful content.” (From Queenie Wong published by MSN and c-net)
There’s the answer to everyone’s prayers and an end to division. Hegelian Dialectic as obvious as ever. The pre-framing here of the whistleblower story (problem) escapes the attention of many (reaction). Eradicate free speech and eliminate any incentives to keep free speech alive and well (solution). Above all, silence all the children with post vaccine heart conditions. Boom, everyone just gets whatever the ministry of truth hands them or gets banished as “manipulative marketers” and amplifiers “of harmful content.”
Now, I am not saying Facebook have by any means been the good guys. They’ve just taken our money, and sometimes, they’ve done what we paid them to do. It’s a service. It is a service for which our competition gets blatantly obvious preferential treatment. I am sure in lieu of profit losses to Facebook, the government will offer some of our stolen money to them as compensation for their agreement to throw us all out with the bathwater.
I can’t wait for the marketers of this bologna, those who went to town making this whistleblower look like a hero and those called in to alleviate the market of competition as bastions of safety and children’s health to wake up and be out of their job. Sooner or later, they unintentionally print a truth that goes against their overlords. These people always have a way of eating their own in the end.
They are insatiable.