Imagine for a minute testing a new targeted chemotherapy treatment on over 40,000 random people who were not diagnosed with this specific and rare form of cancer and then just waiting six months to see if the placebo group or the other group got that specific cancer.
Imagine if the researchers understated and downplayed any injuries from the chemo to 20,000 people by suggesting whatever happened to these healthy people, regardless of the chances of them having an adverse reaction to this very specific and rare form of cancer being slim that what the cancer did if someone happened to have the worst symptoms (even more rare) was worse than the reactions all these healthy people had-whatever it was-short of death.
Imagine, now, researchers ignoring that some people were more exposed to carcinogens based on their habits and lifestyle choices, but refusing to collect or factor in that data.
Imagine these same researchers ignoring that some people were genetically predisposed to this particular cancer but refusing to test anyone first for said predisposition.
Imagine that the researchers decided they needed to unblind the test by not giving cancer tests to those who got the chemo- and only those in the control because the symptoms of the chemo mimicked cancer and they didn't want false positives (knowing that the tests for this cancer were rife with them) messing with the outcome they hoped for.
Imagine that at the end of it all, less than 200 people total were diagnosed with this cancer with almost zero symptoms in either group with a diagnosis based entirely on these faulty tests that were rife with false positives and only give to one of the groups.
Imagine having the realization that less than 200 people as your entire test is hailed as statistically insignificant for something suggested for widespread use regardless of break down.
Now regardless of the insignificance of such a radically reduced trial with such horrible protocols throughout, imagine that most of those irrelevantly testing positive were in the placebo group (which would obviously be attributed to the lack of testing among the chemo group).
And then, imagine boasting with great magnitudes of assurance repeated all day and all night "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, SAFE AND EFFECTIVE..." and a 95% efficacy (fabrication) rating by just eliminating (by open admission) over 39,800 people from your trial!
Imagine discovering that based on this obviously farcical 95% and the repetition of those two words "safe and effective", corporate-sponsored-government's elected researchers around the world were demanding everyone use the product that the corporations (who run the governments who elected the researchers and scientists who had worked their whole lives for those same corporations) are producing.
Ladies and gentleman, that is EXACTLY how these injection trials were run. Look it up if you don't believe me.
It was all correlation, based on nothing even close to the scientific method and that is ironic to me. It's laughably ironic.
The same people who have been saying for decades "correlation doesn't equal causation" and "trust the science" are completely contradicting both parroted phrases.